Community, Resources

Community, Resources

Animated gif of Em Sanders at CCPH table at Pride in the Park Health and Wellness Fair
CC BY-NC-ND via Center for Critical Public Health

Recently Center for Critical Public Health got the opportunity to have a table at the Pride in the Park Health and Wellness Fair. Happy 4th Anniversary and a huge thanks to the Oakland LGBTQ Center for organizing the event and welcoming us to share space with groups like the HIV Education and Prevention Project of Alameda County (HEPPAC) doing vital work in the Bay Area! Beautiful weather and lovely people made for a day of much-needed community celebration and resource-full-ness by the lake.

At the CCPH table we focused on getting the word out about our Tobacco Harm Reduction Study and answering questions folks had about our work. Alongside getting to chat with people about the study and our research group, I also loved learning about some of the other organizations in attendance.

What resources have you found helpful or supportive? Let us know in the comments below.

I found out about ProjectQ, a non-profit founded in LA that provides affirming haircuts and other services to LGBTQIA+ young people experiencing housing insecurity. The booth across from us was run by One Degree, an online hub connecting people to all kinds of resources, social services, and local support. After the celebration we made sure to add both of these, along with HEPPAC’s harm reduction services, to the Community and Emergency Resources List we provide to participants in our studies. I feel a bit remiss for not having these orgs on my radar sooner, but, better late than never! Glad I can pass the info on now.

During set up and throughout the afternoon I also got to know our table-neighbors, who were there telling people about an online survey being conducted on experiences of inclusion, exclusion and representation in the Castro. I was excited to hear about these efforts for gathering community input because participants in our studies with LGBTQ+ folks over the past 5 years have highlighted these issues repeatedly in their narratives on identity, community, and stigma.

Continue reading
Taking care

Taking care

Drawing shows newspaper with "World ending" headline together with post-it note that says "Take care"
Image by Alan Johnson @maklvane

“I hope you are taking good care during these stressful and uncertain times.”

We’ve all likely received many emails containing this phrase in the past year. What does it mean to take good care and maintain wellbeing in general? During a pandemic? During a prolonged period of civil unrest?

We began interviewing for the Tobacco Harm Reduction study two months after San Francisco’s shelter-in-place order took effect in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. One year later, with the pandemic ongoing, interviews continue to take place, online, with LGBTQ+ young adults (18-25) who smoke or used to smoke cigarettes. Each participant provides a window into their unique pandemic experience, and I became deeply interested in hearing how people talked about their mental health and personal wellbeing during this time.

There is no doubt that the pandemic has presented a number of challenges to mental health. As a society, we’ve had to navigate varying degrees of loss and grief, unprecedented stress and uncertainty, economic decline and social isolation. Uncertainty is always hard to manage, and while ideally there would be a communal or collective way to manage pandemic stress, in our society the responsibility ultimately falls on the individual to be proactive, to focus on what’s in their control, to move their body and to prioritize the “self” in self-care.

Daily life during the pandemic looks different for everyone, and as participants described shifts in daily routines, rituals and priorities, I noticed that several participants discussed the value of having time for themselves that did not exist pre-pandemic. While some were struggling with newly unstructured time, many were also engaging in healing practices. For instance, Jade, a 23-year-old, queer Chicana cis woman, is a college student whose employment ended with the pandemic, but who had some money saved. Prior to the pandemic, Jade had a busy social life and would regularly get dressed up and go out dancing with friends to unwind. She described how the pandemic shifted things for her:

One of the major things that I do to let off steam and kind of socialize with my friends, is gone. […] I’ve been really ramping up my own mental health, healing journey. So, I started therapy about a year ago now. And so, just this week actually, I joined a support group for adult survivors of child abuse. And it’s my first time ever going to a support group. It was like a really big deal. So, I guess, kind of just like focusing more on my mental health and stuff, because I finally – you know, I can’t distract myself with other people.

Continue reading
Pandemic stress & tobacco harm reduction

Pandemic stress & tobacco harm reduction

Outline of person surrounded by hazard symbols
We can’t make perfect choices all the time.
Base image: Risk, CC-BY Nithinan Tatah

Candy is a queer, nonbinary Iranian person living in Oakland and working remotely as a teacher. Their former use of cigarettes was strongly associated with situations where they felt heightened anxiety. In these instances, Candy utilized cigarette smoking as a tool to take some space away from the situation and calm down. Though this was not a regular occurrence in the past, it is necessary to contextualize the role of stress in Candy’s current use:

“Like, ’cause my rent is more than half my paycheck, and my partners had to move away because they can’t afford it here… and also that we’ve been in our homes for a year because we just couldn’t get it together to do things better… But if I didn’t need to grasp at whatever I could to cope with what’s happening around me, there would be no benefit to this for me, and I would have no desire to smoke or anything else.”

Candy’s narrative reflects resource scarcity — their rent is half their paycheck and their partners can no longer afford to live in the state. The pandemic has been stressful for Candy, and this resource-related stress and isolation spurred a desire to smoke cigarettes again.

However, cigarettes are expensive — the cost per pack has increased by about $3 since the last time they bought one over a year ago. A former coworker introduced Candy to oral nicotine pouches, which are $2 per tin of about 20 pouches. In the Bay Area, that means that one nicotine pouch is about 80% cheaper than one cigarette ($.10/pouch vs $.50-.60/cigarette).

When I asked Candy, “If you had to say one reason right now to tell someone else why you use your nicotine pouches, what would it be?” they replied:

“Harm reduction. Yeah, the pandemic is hard. I’m having a time. Of all of the things I could use to cope, this feels the least destructive. It’s less expensive, and it feels like it takes less of a toll on my body than other things that I could be using. It feels more responsible than like, drinking a bunch, ’cause you know, if I’m teaching, I can do this while I do that…”

The decision to switch from cigarettes to nicotine pouches is a choice with straightforward implications of harm reduction. Candy had family members experience terminal cancer and noted that Covid-19 is a virus affecting the lungs, so switching to a non-inhaled product with less hand-to-mouth contact was a good option for them. Furthermore, the pouches weren’t a financial burden for Candy, and fit into the new rhythms of their everyday life teaching remotely and sheltering in place.

Candy commented on the nicotine effects as being useful and grounding, and specifically remarked that nicotine and tobacco use are better (for their body and for their job) than excessive drinking — a perspective shared by several other participants too.

This indicates a complex process of considerations around harm and risk when it comes to nicotine and tobacco use for many of the people we’ve spoken to in this study, revealing the breadth of harm reduction and its implications. When I asked Candy what they meant by “harm reduction,” they put it this way:

“I feel like if I tried to set the expectation of myself that I’m just not going to use any kinds of substances or not do things that I know are not good for me, like, period, full stop, that’s not a realistic expectation. And in the past, I’ve tried to make decisions like that… What happens is that it becomes all that I think about. And I don’t do it for a while, and then I give in and go way overboard, and it’s worse… I want to take care of myself. I want to make good choices. I can’t make perfect choices all the time. So, I’m going to do my best to make better ones.”

App That Converts Air Pollution Into Cigarettes

App That Converts Air Pollution Into Cigarettes

This Lifehacker post is from 2018 so perhaps y’all are already aware, but my partner just alerted me to the existence of an app entitled “Sh**t! I Smoke.”

Thought it was especially relevant to share here in the Bay Area given the current climate (literally), and even moreso considering

  1. the number of participants in the Stigma study who framed the harmfulness of cigarette smoking within the context of larger, structural health threats re: environmental pollution (most often in a “so smoking doesn’t really matter in the scheme of things” sort of way, in terms of their own health and in response to concerns/accusations that smoking is a particularly harmful and/or major source of environmental pollution)

  2. compounded concerns about population-level and individual respiratory health amid fires + COVID

  3. will be very interesting to see how the theme mentioned in point 1 shows up in our current study on Tobacco Harm Reduction given point 2!

Everything about this app is rhetorically FASCINATING.

The app icon is the shape of a poop emoji made out of a cigarette.

Cigarette twisted into the shape of a poop emoji

Everyone is a smoker within the language of this app…

Screen capture from app, point location in Oakland, CA, says "OMG! You smoke 9.3 cigarettes daily"Screen capture from app, point location in Oakland, CA, says "Dang! You smoke 64.9 cigarettes weekly"

… and it’s obvious that that is BAD.

Screen capture from app, reads "Loading... Cough... Cough"

But at the same time the positioning of personal responsibility, victimhood, innocence, and contagion are structured totally differently.

Screen capture from app says "The app was inspired by Berkeley Earth's findings about the equivalence between air pollution and cigarette smoking. The rule of thumb is... one cigarette per day is the rough equivalent of a PM2.5 level of 22"

Neat, wow, yikes, enjoy!

(All images via the Sh**t! I Smoke app)